Hmmm… I guess people should not judge about Pamela Anderson and her strong advocacy towards animal rights.
However, I would’ve been more appreciative of her if she joins Brigitte Bardot’s animal rights foundation–it is less propaganda-ic, and more honest. Brigitte Bardot is known to be an animal rights activist ever since.
For one, she invited PNoy formally and politely on a dinner in LA for the latter’s decision to protect Mali the elephant by placing her in a better shelter. I don’t see anything wrong with it, actually. However, there are bashers who judge Pamela for her personal life, sex symbol status and most of all her numerous relationships + the sex scandal.
I don’t think she deserves such lambastment for looking too “inferior” as if comparing her to the “more formal” celebrities.
At least, Pamela Anderson is more respectable than PNoy’s whiner sister Kristetay Laparitis. Sabihin nating promiscuous ‘yang si Pam, but at least, she never ever denied Tommy Lee’s rights to be a father to her two sons with him. In fact, she said it herself that she has always been a good mother and she would often spend time with her kids together with Tommy Lee.
Eh ano ngayon kung hubadera si Pamela Anderson!?
At least she does not ask for any form of publicity, good or bad pa ‘yan. Besides, she does publicize herself in such a way that she will be judged in the right way. There are some judgmental people who think that Kris Aquino is faaaaar better than Pamela Anderson.
Like how I teamed up with Paris Hilton over Lindsay Lohan over the Stavros and Paris Latsis issue, it’s definitely Pamela Anderson that I really admire and respect despite her promiscuous escapades. She does everything to protect the rights of animals, but it would have been better if she did not join PETA. It’s better if she joined Brigitte Bardot’s animal rights foundation, but that’s in French, so we just have PETA (PETA BTW is too propaganda-ic and too protest-oriented).